This is textbook misinformation tactics - assert "something isn't right", make a bunch of spurious connections, hint at conspiracy, but shy away from any concrete or evidence-based claims so you can retreat into "just asking questions" if pressed. I'm not sure if you did this intentionally or not, but from outside it reads like someone with an agenda trying to gin up controversy where there isn't any. Domestic terrorism is tragic, but hardly uncommon, and almost always pretty straightforward - it's almost entirely disaffected men who fall into far-right rabbit holes.
How about we do an Instagram live on the topic of CIA covert operations and political assassinations? I’ll happily make “concrete or evidence-based claims.” Including some of those made in this post.
I mean you can do that, and there's plenty to work with, but that would be changing the subject. What was your intent in discussing THIS topic alongside the CIA discussion, without any evidence of a connection?
Currently there aren't many. "I don't know much about this" is a perfectly reasonable position and indeed should be the default position of almost everyone, about almost everything, almost all the time.
100% psy op
Dan Fournier had a good take:
http://fournier.substack.com/p/hollywood-20-the-tesla-cybertruck
This is textbook misinformation tactics - assert "something isn't right", make a bunch of spurious connections, hint at conspiracy, but shy away from any concrete or evidence-based claims so you can retreat into "just asking questions" if pressed. I'm not sure if you did this intentionally or not, but from outside it reads like someone with an agenda trying to gin up controversy where there isn't any. Domestic terrorism is tragic, but hardly uncommon, and almost always pretty straightforward - it's almost entirely disaffected men who fall into far-right rabbit holes.
How about we do an Instagram live on the topic of CIA covert operations and political assassinations? I’ll happily make “concrete or evidence-based claims.” Including some of those made in this post.
Just like the Trump assassination, I believe that was stage.
Orange man crisis actor. If it was the CIA they don't miss.
I mean you can do that, and there's plenty to work with, but that would be changing the subject. What was your intent in discussing THIS topic alongside the CIA discussion, without any evidence of a connection?
What exactly are the 'evidence based' claims?
Currently there aren't many. "I don't know much about this" is a perfectly reasonable position and indeed should be the default position of almost everyone, about almost everything, almost all the time.
Interesting theory. Nothing surprises me anymore when it comes to corruption.